Homeostatic Imbalances Essay Example for Free

Homeostatic Imbalances Essay High blood pressure (HBP) is a serious condition that can lead to coronary heart disease, heart failure, stroke, kidney failure, and other health problems. Blood pressure is the force of blood pushing against the walls of the arteries as the heart pumps blood. If this pressure rises and stays high over time, it can damage the body in many ways. Overview The condition itself usually has no signs or symptoms. You can have it for years without knowing it. During this time, though, HBP can damage your heart, blood vessels, kidneys, and other parts of your body. Knowing your blood pressure numbers is important, even when youre feeling fine. If your blood pressure is normal, you can work with your health care team to keep it that way. If your blood pressure is too high, treatment may help prevent damage to your bodys organs. Blood Pressure Numbers Blood pressure is measured as systolic (sis-TOL-ik) and diastolic (di-ah-STOL-ik) pressures. Systolic refers to blood pressure when the heart beats while pumping blood. Diastolic refers to blood pressure when the heart is at rest between beats. You most often will see blood pressure numbers written with the systolic number above or before the diastolic number, such as 120/80 mmHg. (The mmHg is millimeters of mercury—the units used to measure blood pressure. ) Blood pressure doesnt stay the same all the time. It lowers as you sleep and rises when you wake up. Blood pressure also rises when youre excited, nervous, or active. If your numbers stay above normal most of the time, youre at risk for health problems. The risk grows as blood pressure numbers rise. Prehypertension means you may end up with HBP, unless you take steps to prevent it. If youre being treated for HBP and have repeat readings in the normal range, your blood pressure is under control. However, you still have the condition. You should see your doctor and follow your treatment plan to keep your blood pressure under control. What is diabetes? Diabetes is the condition in which the body does not properly process food for use as energy. Most of the food we eat is turned into glucose, or sugar, for our bodies to use for energy. The pancreas, an organ that lies near the stomach, makes a hormone called insulin to help glucose get into the cells of our bodies. When you have diabetes, your body either doesnt make enough insulin or cant use its own insulin as well as it should. This causes sugars to build up in your blood. This is why many people refer to diabetes as â€Å"sugar. † Diabetes can cause serious health complications including heart disease, blindness, kidney failure, and lower-extremity amputations. Diabetes is the seventh leading cause of death in the United States. What are the types of diabetes?

Oliver Twist :: essays research papers

OLIVER TWIST CHARACTERS  Harry ~ He is Mrs. Maylie's son, and he is in love with Rose.  Rose ~ She lives with Giles and Brittles, and is unsure on how she feels about Harry until the end.  Oliver ~ Represents the misery and poverty of the poor during the 1800.  Bil ~ He is a professional thief, a very mean person, an alcoholic, and is boyfriend of Nancy.  Toby ~ A thief (he is Bill’s assistant).  Nancy ~ A kindhearted woman who unfortunately pays for being that in the end. She is also Bil's girlfriend (who she is very scared of).  Brittles and Giles ~ The people whose house was broken into by Sikes, Toby, and Oliver. Also the people who took care of Oliver after he came to them almost dead.  Mrs. Bedwin ~ Housekeeper for Mr.Brownlow.  Mr. Brownlow ~ Oliver's first apprentice, he and Mrs.Bedwin took very good care of him.  Fagin ~ Teaches children how to become thieves, but all he does is make the children steal for him so that he doesn’t have to do it himself or an so he wouldn’t get caught doing it.  Doctor Losberne ~ Doctor that helps Oliver after he get shot in the arm.  Mr. and Mrs. Bumble ~ Preppy and Snobby people, and they dislike Oliver.  Mrs. Corny ~ Mr. Bumble's wife, it was her maiden name before she was married to him.  Mr. Monks ~ He was also known as the stranger, but he was really Edward Leeford (Oliver brother).  Mrs. Maylie ~ She is Harry's mother. SUMMARY Bil Sikes, Toby Crackit, and Oliver robbed Brittles and Giles. In the process of the robbery Oliver is shot in the arm and so Sikes wouldn't get caught he left Oliver in a ditch to die. The next morning he walks to Brittles and Giles house and took him in and called the Doctor. When the doctor came he said that he was very excited to see the boy. After Oliver's arm is taken care of Brittles, Giles, Rose, Mrs. Maylie, and the doctor decided not to tell the police, but what they decide to do is take care of him and give him a home. When Oliver told them his story they felt very bad for him, so they left him alone to recover.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  When Oliver did recover he finds out that Mr. Brownlow and Mrs. Bedwin had moved to the West Indies.

Why Do the Events of 1857-8 in India Matter?

The events of 1857-8 are extremely significant and have changed India dramatically into the India we see today. We see the British taking over India from the East India Company after a ‘mutiny’ in 1857 and welcoming it into a colony in the British Empire. It was described as â€Å"the jewel in the crown† of the British Empire because of their rich sources such as silk that were deported from India to countries in Europe. This made Britain considerably richer and greedier as they increased their power by continuing to expand their empire.The British made many positive changes as well as negative changes in India during their rule such as introducing technology such as expanding railways for everyone to use, and education for some Indians. These are just a few changes that helped a trade-inspired outlook within India. Nevertheless, they also took advantage of the Indians by making money from their resources, charging them heavy taxes to use in Britain and sending ma ny Indians to fight for Britain in the First World War.We see that many changes shaped the modern India today, but why do these changes matter to us? We find out much about British rule in India from the outbreak of fighting of the mutiny before 1857 as it tells us about how the East India Company forced strict rules and intervened upon the Hindu society such as ignoring their religious beliefs, which was one of the key factors leading up to the Indian ‘mutiny’. We see that although some changes did benefit from the Indians, the general attitude was negative, since all Indians were heavily taxed as discriminated.The way Britain changed from a trader to a ruler reveals to us how greedy Britain were at the time and how powerful as they could gain control of such a big country like India. We also can see how the British abused their power as they treated the Indians unfairly, as, in an account written by Vishnubhat Godse, an Indian who was living in the city of Jhansi in 1 857, described how they British took power of it.He remarked that the English were â€Å"shooting down every man that they saw and setting fire to houses† while entering the city and described that â€Å"the terror in the city at this time was immeasurable† and that the â€Å"screaming and crying was endless†. We see that the Indians were portrayed as vulnerable and weak as the British took over. Furthermore, the British broke their own policy, the Doctrine of Lapse by taking over the city since the deceased prince did have an adopted son. This shows the desire for more territory overpowering the need to follow the treaties they had made with he princes of states and therefore ignoring their own rules. The corruption, ignorance and brutality within the East India Company showed that they were not successful in ruling as it caused the mutiny in 1857 and therefore made the Indians very unhappy. The accounts of events of 1857 reveal to us that India was not ruled w ell, was a much divided country and that the citizens in general were not satisfied on being controlled by Britain . Many Indians were very unhappy about the British interfering in Hindu socio-religious affairs and charging them high taxes etc.However, many Indians benefited from British rule and profited much from trade. Europeans who had settled down in India were considered of a much higher class than the Indians and Indians were discriminated. This reveals how people in India all had different attitudes towards the British. We can see that by many different accounts of the outbreak of fighting in India. For example, an English clergyman’s wife describes in her diary the â€Å"horror† that the Indians have inflicted and how there was â€Å"heavy firing all day† and how â€Å"ten Europeans were killed†.However, another account from an Indian man, Vishnubhat Godse, claimed that he â€Å"was filled with dread† and that the English soldiers â€Å"t ortured them, demanding rupees, gold, pearls or other valuables† and if they found those, they sometimes would let the innocent Indians free. These primary sources reveal to us how chaotic India was and the different views people held. We can also draw from this how unsuccessful Britain was at ruling. The consequences of 1857 changed India to be the India we see today.In 1858, Queen Victoria read, â€Å"We disclaim the right and desire to impose out [Christian] convictions on any of our subjects†. This meant that she did not want to bring about any further religious change in India. The British invested heavily in large irrigation projects in order to increase food production and primary education for Indians. They also dramatically expanded the railways and jobs in the government were opened to Indian applicants. These are just some of the examples of the changes made to make India a trade-inspired country and modernised.This can be considered the first step made to ma king the India it is today. Even though the ‘mutiny’ did not gain independence for the Indians, this was a significant turning point in the history of India. The ‘mutiny’, regarded by many as India's first War of Independence, had many important consequences and the structure of British India was to be re-organised extensively, including the East India company being cast out on its role and Queen Victoria being crowned Empress of India in 1877, the British investing in large irrigation projects, education and railways.However, there had been no real danger that British rule in India would be overthrown during the ‘mutiny’. The majority of the native soldiers had remained loyal. In fact, without them the British could hardly have suppressed the rebellion. During the attack on Delhi, for example, from the 11,200 soldiers on the British side, there were 7,900 Indian soldiers. Large areas of the country remained unaffected by what the Indians calle d  Ã¢â‚¬Å"the devil's wind. † So had the revolt been?Was it just a military mutiny in a part of the army, as the British believed, or a national uprising, as later Indian historians have argued? The truth lies somewhere in between. It was traditional India that had risen against the British, as the British had tried to push Christianity upon the Indians, the India which remembered its past, hated the present and dreaded the future that was now absolutely certain to belong to the Westernized Indian, and not to the Indian soldiers or princes.The ‘mutiny’ is a chapter of Indian history that will be remembered as something to learn from and although the British defeated the Indians in the ‘mutiny’, many Indians still desired independence as they felt they were not treated fairly. This mattered significantly as the unsatisfied need for independence continued even though good changes were made. Therefore this was a key point in Indian history which was re membered and was certainly a factor to build up to when India actually gained independence in 1947.It also resulted in change in the attitudes of the citizens after the ‘mutiny’ as many Indians were treated maliciously after the ‘mutiny’ as we can see from ‘Empire’ by Jeremy Paxman: â€Å"Entire villages were burned down; mutineers were smeared in pig fat before execution, tied to the muzzles of cannon and blown to pieces. At the site of Cawnpore massacre rebels were made to lick the dried blood from the floor† From this short xtract be can see how unmerciful the British were after the mutiny, as they killed rebels in painful ways while making them break the rules of their faith by smearing them in pig fat and making them lick blood from the floor as it broke their religious beliefs. The way the Indians were treated will always be remembered and so it continues the need for independence. However, many good changes were made after the m utiny that will be remembered as good such as the modernisation of the country to give India a trade-inspired outlook. So how do the events of 1857-8 matter?They matter because the ‘mutiny’ made a platform for a bigger rebellion for independence, it brought India the technology it needed, and Britain started to build India to be the India we see today, although there were some negative effects as well. As a modern audience, we can remember these events in a positive light, and remember them as changes that put India onto a road to modernisation. Images The 93rd Sutherland Highlanders, November 1857 during the Indian Mutiny Incident in the Subzee Mundee, a watercolour of the Indian Mutiny or rebellion of 1857 by British artist G F Atkinson Drawing railways the British built in India

The World And The Word By Eugene Merrill, Mark Rooker And...

Theologist and scientists have relentlessly contemplated the idea of creation; how exactly was the earth created? Creationism and evolution have become progressively more controversial within the Christian body. In The World And The Word by Eugene Merrill, Mark Rooker and Michael Grisanti explains the three major positions on the creation of the universe: the theistic evolution, in which absolute evolution and natural selection occur, old-earth creationism, involving divine intervention and evolution, and young-earth creationism, consisting of six solar days (180). â€Å"Merriam-Webster Online defines â€Å"creationism† as: â€Å"a doctrine or theory holding that matter, the various forms of life, and the world were created by God out of nothing and†¦show more content†¦Proponents of this view regard the text of Gen 1:1-2:3 as a narrative text and so they interpret it literally . . .. They regard days of the creation week as solar days, around 24 hours in length. Th e fact that the word â€Å"days† is preceded by an ordinal number and is accompanied by the phrase â€Å"evening and morning† supports this interpretation. During this creative week, God brought into existence the entire universe, including the earth and all forms of plant, animal, and human life that inhabited it (181). Thus, the idea of theistic evolution and old-earth creationism is not supported, and the use of the word ‘days’ should be interpreted literally. EVIDENCE OF YOUNG-EARTH CREATIONISM. Theistic evolution and old-earth Creationism is supported by scientific discoveries, and then focuses on using the Bible as historical evidence. Many believe that scientific information proves that the earth is billions of years old, and that the days in Genesis should not be interpreted as literal twenty-four hour days. Scientific evidence of fossils and evolution are merely humanistic estimations of time. Evolutionists and old-earth creationism seek to justify the days of creation in Genesis through 2 Peter 3:8; â€Å"†¦with the Lord one day is like a thousand years . . ..† (NASB). This passage is misleading to the length of days needed for creation; God’s day is not stated as a thousand years. The context of thisShow MoreRelatedOedipus Rex Research Paper2420 Words   |  10 Pagesdirectly respond to Job’s questions on why he was suffering so much, â€Å"rather †¦, God taught Job a more important truth. Even though much in the created world is inco mprehensible to humans and sometimes even threatening to their existence, it is all the work of a wise God who has His own unfathomable purpose for all He does† (Merrill, Rooker and Grisanti 2003). â€Å"Don’t assume people suffer because God is punishing them for sin, that’s a common misunderstanding in Bible times–which Job’s story tries to

Williams Name Meaning and Origin

Williams is a common patronymic (descended from the fathers lineage) surname with several possible origins, however, in Wales, adding an s to the end of a surname denotes son of, pointing to Wales as the country of origin. Williams is the third most popular surname in the United States Williams and is also highly popular in England, Scotland, Australia, and Germany. Famous People with the Surname Williams Thomas Lanier Tennessee Williams: An American author and playwright who won the Pulitzer Prize for Drama for A Streetcar Named Desire (1948) and Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (1955).Hiram Hank Williams: American country music legend, credited with pioneering honky-tonk.Robin Williams: American comedian and actorRoger Williams: Founder of Rhode IslandJohn (Towner) Williams: An award-winning American composer, conductor, and pianist whose Oscar-winning scores for such films as Star Wars, Jaws, E.T., and Schindlers List have made him one of the most highly regarded film composers of all time. Fast Facts for the Surname Williams Name Origin:  English, WelshPossible Derivations: Son or descendant of Guillemin, a pet form of Guillaume, the French form of William; From the Belgic guild-helm, meaning harnessed with a gilded helmet or  welhelm, the shield or defense of many; from the given name William, an given name combining Old French with Germanic elements: wil, meaning desire, will and helm, meaning helmet or protection.Surname Variations:  William, Willimon, Williman, Williamson, Wilcox, MacWilliams, McWilliams, Willihelm, WillhelmWilliams Trivia: The last man killed in the U.S. Civil War was Private John J. Williams of the 34th Indiana Volunteer Infantry, who died in the battle of Palmetto Ranch, Texas, on May 13, 1865, one month after Lees surrender. Genealogy Resources for the Surname Williams Contrary to what you may have heard, there is no such thing as a Williams family crest or coat of arms.  Coats of arms are granted to individuals, not families, and may rightfully be used only by the uninterrupted male line descendants of the person to whom the coat of arms was originally granted. There are many other avenues of research you can pursue to find information on the Williams surname, including the following: 100 Most Common U.S. Surnames Their Meanings: Smith, Johnson, Williams, Jones, Brown... Are you one of the millions of Americans sporting one of these top 100 common last names from the 2010 Census?Common English Surnames Their Meanings: Williams is the third most popular surname in Great Britain.Most Common Australian Surnames Their Meanings: Williams is third on this list of the most commonly occurring surnames in Australia, which includes details on each names origin and meaningWilliams DNA Project: The Williams DNA project has over 535 participants making it the 2nd largest surname DNA project in the world. The Website includes Williams records from around the world as well.Descendants of William Williams: A genealogy of the descendants of William Williams (1778-1857) from Pittsylvania County, Virginia.FamilySearch—Williams Genealogy: Explore over 29 million historical records and lineage-linked family trees posted for the Williams surname and its variations on the free FamilySearch website, hosted by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.Williams Surname Family Mailing Lists: RootsWeb hosts a free mailing list for researchers of the Williams surname. Post a query about your own Williams ancestors, or search or browse the mailing list archives.DistantCousin.com—Williams Genealogy Family History: Free databases and genealogy links for the last name Williams. Sources Cottle, Basil. Penguin Dictionary of Surnames. Penguin Books. 1967Menk, Lars. A Dictionary of German Jewish Surnames. Avotaynu. 2005Beider, Alexander. A Dictionary of Jewish Surnames from Galicia. Avotaynu. 2004Hanks, Patrick; Hodges, Flavia. A Dictionary of Surnames. Oxford University Press. 1989Hanks, Patrick. Dictionary of American Family Names. Oxford University Press. 2003Smith, Elsdon C. American Surnames. Genealogical Publishing Company. 1997

Dr. John Michael Thomassen s Office And Surgical Suite

Dr. John Michael Thomassen is a Board Certified Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon in Fort Lauderdale. For more than 10 years he has been serving the residents in South Florida. Dr. Thomassen is a member of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons, The American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery, as well as the American Board of Plastic Surgery. Thomassen Plastic Surgery in Fort Lauderdale To ensure that all of his patients receive the high quality care they deserve, Dr. Thomassen performs plastic surgery procedures at his state of the art surgical suite. Dr. Thomassen’s office and surgical suite are specifically designed to provide his patients with a serene, comfortable environment. Dr. Thomassen Performs a Variety of Plastic Surgery Procedures at His Surgical Suite in Fort Lauderdale Plastic surgery and cosmetic surgery procedures are intended to address issues related to an individual’s appearance. Some procedures assist in diminishing the signs of aging; whereas, other plastic surgery procedures are used to contour, enlarge or reduce specific parts of the body. Medical Issues Plastic Surgery Can Address Dr. Thomassen performs reconstructive procedures for patients who have had a mastectomy. Other medical issues that he can address include gynecomastia, skin cancer, micromastia, gigantomastia and a deviated septum. Plastic Surgery Procedures for the Breast A Breast Lift (Mastopexy) A Mastopexy is a procedure that lifts and reshapes the breast. Many times,Show MoreRelatedA Woman s Initial Breast Augmentation Revision Surgery973 Words   |  4 PagesRevision. Women in Fort Lauderdale Need to Choose a Knowledgeable Surgeon Who Has Experience and Excellent Surgical Skills Ensuring an acceptable outcome requires that a surgeon has knowledge related to the potential problems that could occur during any given procedure; furthermore, the surgeon needs to have access to the equipment necessary to diagnose and then treat patients. Dr. Thomassen’s surgical skills, knowledge, innovative equipment and dedication to providing his patients with the best resultsRead MoreDescription Of A Lower Rhytidectomy ( Neck Lift1018 Words   |  5 PagesA Lower Rhytidectomy (Neck Lift) is a surgical procedure designed to address signs of aging in the neck and jawline. Dr. John Michael Thomassen is a Board Certified Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon who performs Neck Lifts at his surgical suite in Fort Lauderdale. Reasons People Choose to Have a Neck Lift Individuals who notice that they have excessive wrinkling in the skin on their neck, a double chin, ‘turkey wattle’ and jowl lines, but do not feel they need a full facelift will sometimes choose

Laramie free essay sample

Media Analysis: The Laramie Project Moises Kaufmans The Laramie Project, is most commonly referred to as a docudrama, a play that is largely based on real facts. The play is all nonfiction facts about the death of Matthew Shepard, a gay college student whose brutal murder shocked the country in 1998. Based on more than 200 interviews with the towns citizens during the year and a half following Shepards murder, members of Moises Kaufmans Tectonic Theater Project, the company best known for the Broadway smash, Gross Indecency: The Three Trials of Oscar Wilde, traveled to Laramie, Wyoming (home to both the victim and his killers), and conducted The Laramie Project, directed by Kaufman with input of the performers, who also served as dramatists/writers. The Laramie Project is a theatrical collage of excerpts from these interviews and from the journals of the actor-writers themselves. Despite the fact that the events of the play are based on actual events with their own drama, Kaufmans talents as a playwright are used to enhance the emotional impact of these events and create an atmosphere that stirs the audience more than just reading of the events does. The question is, how does he do this? The most fascinating aspects of the play are the various reactions and emotions of the people that were interviewed. From the sadness and guilt of some of the townspeople, to the joyful celebration of the so-called â€Å"Reverend† Fred Phelps, played by James Murtaugh. The people who should have felt guilt over Matthew’s death did not, while those who did not bear much or any responsibility sometimes felt a sense of guilt. In this way, the play presents an example of dramatic irony in the reactions of the various groups of people involved. Father Roger Schmit, played by Tom Bower, a Catholic priest, expressed how â€Å"jolted† he was when he bravely performed a vigil for Matthew Shepherd. He also expressed his anger that various religious ministers decided not to â€Å"get involved (p. 5). † The priest was presented as a more sympathetic figure, being one of the most tolerant of the religious figures in the play. He did not even bother to consult the bishop for permission to do the sermon. The Baptist minister’s wife’s thoughts were also interesting. She claimed that her husband’s thoughts about the murder were that â€Å"he has very biblical views about homosexuality†¦he doesn’t condone that k ind of violence†¦but he doesn’t condone that kind of lifestyle†¦ (p. 27). † She doesn’t even realize the ontradiction in her statement about her husband’s opinion, considering the Bible states the death penalty for male homosexuality. She goes on to say that â€Å"we are all hoping this just goes away. † It is almost as though she wants to forget what happened, seeing it as an annoyance, and nothing to get all bent out of shape over. Matt Galloway, played by Joshua Jackson, a bartender that worked at the place where Shepherd is picked up by his two killers, expresses a sense of remorse, despite the fact that he really did not have anything to be sorry for. He said that â€Å"I shoulda noticed. I shoulda not had my head down when I was washing dishes for those twenty seconds. Things I coulda done. (p. 52). † This feeling is probably natural and certainly understandable, but this really shows the dramatic irony. The fact that the bartender feels guilty when he really had nothing to be guilty about and yet the people who bear responsibility for fostering the hatred and intolerance that lead to Matthew’s murder really do not feel much guilt at all. For example, the Baptist minister, He is reluctant to talk about the entire fiasco, but when he does, it is clear how he really feels. While the minister supports the death penalty for Matthew’s killers, his statement about Matthew speak for themselves about his attitude quite clearly. â€Å"I know that his lifestyle was legal†¦I hope that Matthew Shepherd as he was tied to that fence†¦had time†¦to reflect on his lifestyle (p. 69). † Like many, he categorized Matthew Shepherd as a â€Å"lifestyle,† as if every Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, or Transgendered person leads the same lifestyle. He showed no sorrow or regret for Matthew’s murder, and never considered whether or not his sermons may have helped promote the kind of violence that Matthew was a victim of. Unfortunately, this Baptist minister’s actions are minor in comparison to Fred Phelps, who said among other things that â€Å"†¦two times for every verse [the Bible] talks about God’s love it talks about God’s hate (p. 78)†¦we love that attribute of God†¦because God’s hatred is pure (p. 79). This was, undoubtedly, the most extreme reaction in the play to Matthew’s murder, and it is an attitude like this that contributes to the same homophobia that killed Matthew Shepard. Toward the end of the play, one of the murderers, Russell Henderson played by Garret Neergaard, said that he was sorry for killing Matthew Shepherd. â€Å"I know what I did was very wrong, and I regret greatly what I did†¦I’m ready to pay my debt for what I did. (p. 83). â €  This could potentially shatter the dramatic irony, however, I ‘m not so sure that it did. This shows an example of a guilty person, the guiltiest out of everyone in fact, who did express guilt. However, the judge in this case did not buy it, and neither do I. â€Å"You drove the vehicle that took Matthew Shepherd to his death†¦bound him to that fence†¦left him out there for eighteen hours†¦and you did nothing†¦this Court does not believe that you really feel any true remorse for your part in this matter (p. 83). † The judge finishes wondering if Russell Henderson really understands what he did. I can’t help but to wonder the same thing. The range of reactions from the various characters, as written by Kaufman, ran from guilt and sorrow to stubborn denial and even the perverse elation of Fred Phelps. Kaufman highlights the irony by doing a fantastic job showing which characters felt which emotions. The fact that, in general, the characters who were not really at any blame in any way felt guilt, whereas those who were really responsible did not, is an unfortunate irony, but not nearly as unfortunate as the events that lead to the story behind this play. That said, the heart-wrenching nature of this material does eventually come through, gracefully making points about tolerance, the communities we live in and their ability to change. Brian A. Kates excellent editing maintains a strong sense of narrative momentum through the scripts potentially tricky structure. From Laura Linneys monologue as a politely homophobic housewife to Terry Kinney as Dennis Shepard, the grieving father whose agonizing courtroom speech provides emotional climax both Kaufman’s play and film deserve a â€Å"thumbs up† and a job well done with this tragic story.